Article Evaluation

I am doing my evaluation on an article involving CAF-1. Apart of WikiProject Genetics, this article is rated as mid-importance in the stub-class category of quality. I like the amount of references used in article but the information was not labeled, making it seem as if knowledge was being poured out but not organized. The tone of the paper was neutral and the information was relevant, but more elaboration could have been used on their points. In addition, there are some grammar errors that make it hard to read the article.